Risk incidence Occurrence Solution
1) In reference to your proposed Database Design Proposal,
consider a situation where you want to track (and ultimately reduce) the occurrences
of a risk incident within the environment you selected.
2) Identify and select an incident in which you are
interested. An example of an incident could be that which is acquired or
occurred during hospital stays.
3) Develop a 750–1,000 word proposal from the perspective of
the Health Information Manager, which includes a specification of the
requirements, the proposed solution, the database design and/or modifications
to existing databases, and a breakdown of responsibilities among staff to collect,
analyze, and disseminate the information.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will
be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review
the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the
assignment.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Module 3 Rubric: Risk Incidence Occurrence Solution
30.0 %Proposal Components: Requirements, Solution, and
Database Modifications
Description and assessment of the criteria are not outlined
or outlined poorly. Fails to formulate clear possibilities for change.
Minimally outlines the rationale for the design chosen and
lists limitations, and possible extensions. Ignores or superficially assesses
areas of difficulty or modification needs for the database. Formulates vague
and indecisive solutions.
Outlines the rationale for the solution, its requirements,
limitations, and possible extensions. A surface level assessment of the areas
of difficulty or modification of the database is offered. Expresses possible
solutions. Minimal detail is used.
Describes the rationale for the solution, its requirements,
limitations, and possible extensions Assessment is direct, competent, and
appropriate of the areas of difficulty or modifications needed for the
database. Formulates possible process changes or solutions. Some details are
present.
Describes in-depth the rationale for the solution, its
requirements, limitations, and possible extensions. Thoughtfully assesses and
evaluates areas of difficulty or modification for the database. Formulates
clear and precise process changes. Details and examples are present throughout.
20.0 %Proposal Component: Breakdown of Responsibilities
Among Staff to Collect, Analyze, and Disseminate the Information
Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge
is not evident.
Includes little knowledge about the topic with few
supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident.
Includes knowledge about the topic with supporting details
and examples. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Includes essential knowledge about the topic with supporting
details and examples.
Covers topic in-depth with extensive details and examples.
10.0 %Analysis
Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly.
Ignores or superficially evaluates the incident and draws
unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. Lacks supportive evidence and details.
Surface level of evaluation of the incident is offered.
Minimal support for all components is presented.
Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the
incident. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.
Analyzes and evaluates incident from a critical perspective
and draws warranted, judicious, nonfallacious conclusions. Information and
evidence are accurate and appropriate.
20.0 %Comprehension
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements
stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in
the assignment criteria.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or
irrelevant. Research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or timeliness.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and rationales are
clearly stated. Research is adequate, timely, and relevant, and addresses all
of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive;
rationales are clearly stated. Research is adequate, timely, and relevant, and
addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
10.0 %Research
No outside sources were used to support the assignment.
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment.
Limited research is apparent.
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance,
quality of outside sources, and/or timeliness.
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the
issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources
are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence
construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language
use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of “primer
prose” indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses
them inappropriately.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice
(register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of
control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the
most part.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to
communicate clearly.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures
of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are
appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,
grammar, and language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence
construction are employed.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are
present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few
may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written
academic
